BARBARA BOXER vs CARLY FIORINA California Senate Debate pt.4
MOXNews.com September 01, 2010 C-SPAN / KTVU Senator Barbara Boxer and Republican Senate candidate Carly Fiorina answered questions from a panel of California political reporters. KTVU Political Editor Randy Shandobil moderated.
Snarly lied about Boxer refusing to turn the water back on in the valley. What she refuted was Feinstein’s plan to divert water from the Bay Area to central coast farms out of fear that it was too big an expense to Bay Area residents. Where’s Snarly living up to her implication to not mischaracterize records.
You know it must be a HUGE blow to Bab’s ShadowBoxer when the militant biased extreme far leftist liberal S.F. Chronicle refuses to endorse either candidate for U.S. Senator.
This must be historic!
@Needing2Know
I Agree, boxer is a code pink supporter who also hates the military,
she has never met a tax increase she did not like as she is always for unlimited taxation, no wonder this state is in shambles and businesses are leaving in a mass exodus. vote out all incumbents, this one is the worst of them all. BTW, Ma’am Boxer, call me Sir, or better yet, SIR YES SIR, I worked so hard for that title.
@USMCLoneWolf1 And who you want ” MS. BOTOX FIORINA’.
@darwinkilledgod Look at Walmart. Big store not many emoployees…
Boxer prefer ADM to farm marijuna than to have family producers get water so goodbye boxer dovidjenja
I wouldn’t trust Boxer to babysit my dogs. She probably isn’t humane enough to let them have water. ha. ha. She’s a freakin nut job.
fuk barbra boxer and carly they both suck we need sonbody fresh!
Human’s are funny creatures. Here to turn the earth into dust. bla bla bla bla Termites on steroids.
@serfdomthwart Anyone who would consider voting for Boxer would have to be economically mindless so there’s probably little point in trying to explain tactical decision-making in business.
“If you can’t take a stand on Prop 23 I don’t know what you will take a stand on” — like Prop 23 is the Holy Grail of legislation. Listen to Boxer use that patronizing tone of voice like she’s everyone’s intellectual superior. No wonder California is broke, busted, and hanging off the edge of a cliff. No wonder all the technology businesses are going to Texas.
I love how at 01:40 the chick has a face of, “What you talkin’ ’bout Willis?”
Boxer has been in office 28 years….what the hell has she accomplished?
Her elitist out of touch far leftist anti-business, anti-military record is horrible.
Typical tax and spend liberal who cannot answer any direct questions
Fire Ma’am public servant Babs ShadowBoxer, the almost 70 year old senator
@ocelot113 Why don’t we just shoot the people on the no-fly list… that’ll make us safer!
Can someone answer a simple question for me. Why is it democrats seem to hate “big” business but love “small” business? Why do they want to help “family” farms but not “big” farms? Do people who work for big farms not have families? Do big businesses like Coke, Google, Sony, Blizzard, Dell, and Ford not also produce goods for us? Is this anything other than class-warfare and intense jealousy?
Boxer is obviously not answering question straight forward, he keeps on referring to Feingold whose is behind in the polls at his state.
Your are FIRED BOXER!!!!!!!
I always get nervous when people say “… if we don’t remove rights we will be less safe.” that’s not American.
once again the classic battle, weed smoking incompetence vs. pure evil greed
@rumpole33 I don’t support Fiorina, but I dislike her much less than Boxer.
The question referenced specifically the commercial. She explained what the commercial was about. The office being contested here is national office (U.S. Senate). Why is it the job, as you say, of a candidate for the U.S. Senate, a national office, to concern themselves with state issues? It’s not. She’s not running for California Senate.
What is wrong with law-abiding people having automatic weapons, in your opinion?
@rumpole33 Often in these situations, you are faced with two options:
One: keep these 30k no-longer-valuable-to-the-company workers on the payroll and keep hemorrhaging money and risk bankruptcy and having to fire all workers.
or
Two: you can fire 30k workers, stop loosing money, streamline operations and become more efficient, save the remaining workers’ jobs, and eventually survive this period and possibly hire more people in the future.
You have to consider unintended consequences.
@rumpole33 I support neither of the two candidates, but I must point out something.
The role of public servant and private employee are very much different. Fiorina’s goal while CEO of HP was not to create jobs or create jobs programs–it was to make a profit, for herself and for shareholders.
So, you cannot compare the two positions, validly. She fired 30k people because it was in the company’s best interest, i.e. her contracted duty.
Wow I feel bad for my state.
@jkgrewal001 You shouldn’t expect Fiorina to understand things like business or economics. Look what she did at HP and you will see.
EVERY HUMAN BEING that is physically present on American soil, (or that is present in territory under American jurisdiction), enjoys the Due Process protections afforded by the U.S. Constitution. One more item of evidence pointing to the fact that Fiorina has NO CLUE.
I find it troubling the Fiorina said that California’s actions on energy “won’t make a difference.” Clean energy comes one act at a time.